The study area is a predominantly ranching landscape with large range lands used seasonally for cattle grazing, similar to parts of the NRM area for wolf reintroduction in the US. Wolf diet compositions were studied year-round using scat analysis and field searches based on GPS telemetry relocations. The results showed an increase in percent biomass of cattle in wolf diets from 31% during the non-grazing season to 74% during the grazing season. The authors believe that this prey switching is due to the increased presence of cattle within the wolf territories during the grazing season as well as higher nutritional demands of wolf packs since this is the same season during which wolves are rearing pups.
Wolves
were found to scavenge more during the non-grazing season than during the
grazing season, and the majority of scavenging was from the boneyards where
ranchers dispose of carcasses of livestock that have died of disease or are
otherwise unfit for human consumption. Because boneyards are only required to
be 400 meters from facilities or residences, boneyard scavenging brings wolves
dangerously close to humans and livestock. In addition, it gives wolves a taste
for cattle and increases the likelihood that they will prey on livestock
instead of wild ungulates.
The management technique proposed in
this paper is the use of metal storage bins for anything that may attract
wolves or other carnivores, such as carcasses, grain, or garbage. The use of
these bins not only decreases the chances of wolves approaching facilities or
residences, but also prevents them from becoming accustomed to eating cattle
due to scavenging from boneyards.
Although this study was performed in
Canada, I believe that the proposed development of management plans aimed at
reducing wolf-livestock interactions also applies to areas of wolf
reintroduction in the US. The area where the study was performed and the NRM
area are similar in that they are both ranching landscapes that overlap wolf
territories. The plan proposed in the article for use of metal storage bins to
limit access to objects which might attract wolves should also be implemented
in the US.
In my opinion, further development
of additional management plans is integral to the support of wolf conservation
in the US. Not only will these plans reduce loss of livestock to wolves and
therefore the impact of wolves on the livestock industry, they also have the
potential to positively influence the attitudes of ranchers toward wolf
conservation. Resources detailing the research being done and the management
plans being implemented should be made available to all ranchers in the area.
Compromises on the issues surrounding wolf reintroduction cannot be reached
without thorough communication and cooperation between wolf conservationists
and livestock producers.
1.Morehouse,
A.T., & Boyce, M.S. (2011). From venison to beef: seasonal changes in wolf
diet composition in a livestock grazing landscape. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(8), 440-445.
No comments:
Post a Comment